Building a new product with workflows at its core: why teams start with a workflow editor foundation

When teams build new products, one question comes up early:

“Do we really want to build workflow UI from scratch?”

For products where workflows are central to the user experience - automation tools, AI platforms, decision systems - the answer is increasingly no.

This article explains when and why teams use a workflow editor as a foundation for new products and standalone applications.

Greenfield products don’t mean starting from zero

Building a new product does not mean every component must be built from scratch.

From product discovery calls, a recurring theme emerges:

“We want to focus on our domain logic - not on reinventing workflow UX.”

Teams building greenfield products often:

• already know workflows will be core,
• want to avoid premature backend coupling,
• need something production-ready early.
  

Why workflow UI is often underestimated

Workflow editors seem simple - until they aren’t.

Teams report unexpected complexity in:

• validation and edge cases,
• configuration UX,
• long-term maintainability,
• adapting UI to domain-specific rules.
  

This makes workflow UI a poor candidate for “we’ll build it later.”

A foundation, not a platform

Using a workflow builder as a foundation does not mean adopting a full platform.

In most successful architectures:

• the workflow editor is frontend-only,
• workflows are stored as JSON,
• execution logic evolves independently,
• domain-specific behavior lives in the backend.
  

This separation allows teams to:

• iterate quickly,
• avoid early architectural lock-in,
• scale execution independently of UI.
  

Standalone app vs embedded product

The same foundation works in two scenarios:

Embedded - workflows inside an existing SaaS

Standalone - workflows as the core of a new product

In both cases, the workflow editor provides:

• a consistent modeling experience,
• a stable UX layer,
• flexibility to evolve backend logic over time.
  

When this approach makes sense

Using a workflow builder as a foundation works best when:

• workflows are central to your product,
• execution logic is domain-specific,
• long-term ownership matters,
• you want to avoid building workflow UX twice.
  

Final takeaway

Greenfield does not have to mean “from scratch.”

For products where workflows are a core feature, starting with a production-ready workflow editor provides a stable foundation - without forcing premature backend or platform decisions.

‍